![]() ![]() NOTE: I suspect the Higher or Highest quality settings may make a difference as resolution increases, bit rate decreases or with HDR material. Both were compressed with a 2 Mbps variable data rate. Neither version exhibited any artifacts during playback. While I didn’t put this under a video scope, I could not see any image differences either during playback or paused. Here’s a still from the compressed HEVC version, Good quality on top and Highest quality on the bottom. So, if you are buying a system specifically for video compression, a faster CPU will save you time. NOTE: However, compression speeds do improve with faster CPUs. However, for anything going to YouTube or other social media, a setting of Good seems to me to sufficient.Īlso, to the best of my understanding, HEVC is not hardware-accelerated in Adobe Media Encoder. Only you can decide which quality option to pick, based on your deadline and requirements. 471 seconds to compress at the Highest Quality level (27.7x longer than Good).60 seconds to compress at the Higher Quality level (3.5x longer than Good).17 seconds to compress using HEVC at the Good Quality level. ![]() However, as image quality improves, compression time increases dramatically. Moving to HEVC, we can select the level of image quality we want. I didn’t see any artifacts, even though there was a lot of movement in the frame.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |